Prepared forHollywood Beverage
Market Position ReviewPortland and Gladstone, Oregon · Beverage retail · 27 August 2026
This report is for Oregon liquor agents who also run a private beer, wine and accessories business alongside the state's spirits shelf.
The finding

Oregon owns the spirits on your shelf, sets their price, and pays you a fixed commission. So the one part of your business the public record measures in full is the one part where you have no pricing or margin decision to make.

Oregon is a control state. The OLCC buys every bottle of distilled spirits sold here, warehouses it, sets its price, and supplies roughly 280 independently operated agent stores. Agents do not own the inventory and cannot mark a bottle up or down. Compensation is a commission rate fixed by statute.

That makes the state's sales file an unusually complete record of an unusually constrained business. It reports $96,780,878 of spirits across your 2 stores over 83 months, and it reports the same for every competitor you have. What it cannot report is anything you actually decide: your wine and beer assortment, your cigar and accessory range, what any of it costs you, or what you keep.

So this report does two things. It uses the state file for the one thing it is uniquely good at, which is showing you exactly where you sit against every other agent in Oregon. And it is explicit that the business those numbers describe is the third you control least.

Stores you operate
2
Portland and Gladstone , both on the state file
What a one-store reading would cover
71.2%
the file carries no ownership column to link them
Your combined spirits sales on file
$96,780,878
across 83 months
Your control over spirits price and margin
None
the state owns the inventory and sets the price
Part 1. First, the thing a store-level read gets wrong about you

You run 2 stores. Oregon's file lists them as separate businesses, because it carries no column saying who owns what.

You run 2 stores. A store-level reading of the state file describes 71.2% of you.
$0 $20,663,376 $41,326,752 $61,990,129 $82,653,505 $68,877,921 Portland (store 1182) $27,902,957 Gladstone (store 1256) Spirits sales on file
Total distilled spirits sales for both of your locations across the 83 months on file, $96,780,878 combined. Oregon's dataset carries no ownership column, so these two appear in it as unrelated businesses. Source: Oregon Liquor and Cannabis Commission, distilled spirits store sales (gyqr-vac8).

Portland store 1182 and Gladstone store 1256 both trade as Hollywood Beverage. Read the file store by store, as its structure invites, and the larger one looks like the whole company at 71.2% of your actual spirits volume.

Why we are opening with a methodology point.Because it changes every number that follows, and because it is the single easiest way to be confidently wrong about a multi-site operator. Every figure in this report is the two stores combined unless it explicitly says otherwise.
Part 2. The line the state measures is the line you control least

You cannot set the price, you do not own the inventory, and the commission rate is in statute. Volume is the only variable you hold.

In a control state the spirits business runs on the state's terms. The OLCC purchases from distilleries, warehouses the product, prices it, and places it in your store as its own inventory. You cannot discount a slow bottle, cannot mark up a scarce one, and cannot negotiate cost. Your compensation is a commission percentage written into Oregon Revised Statutes.

Every ordinary retail lever is therefore unavailable on the majority of your floor's headline category. No buying advantage, no pricing strategy, no margin management. What remains is footfall and mix, and mix only within a price list you did not write.

Where your actual business decisions live.Wine, beer, cider, mixers, cigars, tobacco, growlers and barware are private categories. You buy them, you price them, you keep the margin, and not one of them appears in any public dataset.
Part 3. What the state file IS uniquely good for

It is a complete census of every competitor in Oregon, by store and by month, with no sampling and no self-reporting. Almost no retailer anywhere has that.

Roughly 280 agent stores operate in Oregon and the state publishes sales for all of them. That means the question most retailers can never answer, which is what the shop across town actually sells, is answerable here exactly, every month, going back 83 months.

Forward playWhat the record prices it atVerdict
Improve your spirits marginNot available in Oregon. The state owns the inventory, sets the retail price and sets your commission by statute. There is no margin here to improve, which is the single most important fact about this business model.Rejected
Discount slow-moving spirits to clear themAlso unavailable. Agents cannot mark bottles up or down. The pricing lever that would be obvious in any other retail category does not exist on this shelf.Rejected
Negotiate better spirits buying termsThere is no buying relationship to negotiate. The OLCC purchases from distilleries and supplies agent stores with state-owned stock, so cost of goods is not a variable you hold.Rejected
Open a third locationAgent appointments are limited and awarded through a separate periodic open recruitment, not opened at will. Roughly 280 exist statewide and you already hold two of them, which is the scarce asset rather than the growth path.Rejected
Read the state file as a scorecard for your own performanceIt measures the constrained third of your business at one store at a time. Read store by store it describes 71.2% of you, and read completely it still says nothing about the categories you actually price.Rejected
Shift floor space from spirits to private categoriesStructurally sensible and unprovable from outside. We can see what the state pays you and not what your wine, beer and accessory business earns, so recommending a reallocation would be reasoning dressed as analysis.Untestable
Build the RTD and non-alcoholic rangesThe national direction is clear, with spirits RTDs up 14% and non-alcoholic up 19.2% while every traditional category fell. Whether you are already there is in your point-of-sale data and nowhere else.Untestable
Defend and grow the licensee channelGenuinely valuable and the natural follow-on. Licensee volume moves in named accounts, the state file shows the movement monthly for every competitor, and commission rates differ by channel so mix changes earnings on identical volume. It is second only because it is the output of the map below rather than a separate action.Second
Use the state census as a competitor map for both marketsThe only recommendation here that the available data fully supports. Oregon publishes monthly sales for roughly 280 agent stores including every competitor in Portland and Gladstone , split by licensee and public channel. No other retail sector has a complete competitor census, it costs nothing, and it answers the question you cannot otherwise ask: who is taking what, from whom, and in which month.Pursue

That is worth more pointed outward than inward. Used on yourself it measures the constrained third of your business. Used on the market it tells you which competitors are growing, which are shrinking, and specifically which are taking or losing the restaurant and bar accounts that move in identifiable, nameable blocks.

The reframe this report is really making.Stop reading the state file as a scorecard for your business and start reading it as a map of everyone else's. On the first job it is structurally limited. On the second it is close to unique.
Part 4. Where the growth actually is, and why this dataset cannot see it

Spirits volumes fell in 2025. The categories that grew double digits sit almost entirely outside the file.

The category the state measures is the one falling. The categories growing are ones it cannot see.
-7.2% 0.4% 7.9% 15.5% 23.0% -4.0% Spirits -6.0% Beer -6.0% Wine 14.0% Spirits-based RTDs 19.2% Non-alcoholic US volume change, 2025
US volume change in 2025: total alcohol volumes fell 5%, with spirits down 4%, beer and wine down 6% each. Spirits-based ready-to-drink rose 14% and non-alcoholic beer, wine and spirits rose 19.2% to pass $1.01bn off-premise. Sources: IWSR and beverage industry reporting, 2026.

US alcohol volumes fell 5% in 2025. Spirits fell 4%, beer and wine 6% each. Over the same period spirits-based ready-to-drink rose 14%, and non-alcoholic beer, wine and spirits rose 19.2% to pass a billion dollars off-premise. Two thirds of retailers now name RTDs as the biggest shift in the category and more than half are expanding shelf space for them.

An operator reading only the state file would see a declining business. That is a true statement about spirits and a misleading one about beverage retail, because the growth moved into aisles the state does not track.

What we cannot tell you, and will not pretend to.Whether YOUR RTD and non-alcoholic sales are following the national pattern. Those sit in your point-of-sale system and nowhere else, which is why they are the first thing in the data ask.
Part 5. The strongest argument against everything above

Three objections, and the third is the reason this report stops short of telling you to change your mix.

First: spirits is the traffic driver. People come for the bottle and buy the mixer on the way past, so the constrained category earns its floor space by bringing the customer through the door. Fair, and it argues for attention to spirits footfall rather than to spirits margin, which does not exist.

Second: a state agency at scale is a defensible annuity. Appointments are limited and awarded through periodic recruitment, roughly 280 exist in the whole state, and you hold two. A fixed commission on volume you already have is worth defending before chasing margin elsewhere. This is a genuine opposite view and a reasonable one.

Third, and strongest: we cannot see your private categories, so we cannot prove they matter more. Everything above about wine, beer and accessories is structural reasoning about a control state, not measurement of your business. That is precisely why the recommendation below is not a mix recommendation. It is the one action the data we do hold can actually support.

Part 6. Nine responses, and the six the record rules out

In a control state most retail advice is unavailable by law, which narrows the field faster than usual.

Each play below was tested against the state file, the statute and published category data. Several are rejected not because they would not work but because Oregon does not permit them, which is a kind of clarity most markets do not offer.

Part 7. What we would do first, and it uses data you already have access to

Point the state file outward: build the competitor map for both of your markets, then tell us what your private categories are doing.

The file covers every agent in Oregon monthly. For Portland and Gladstone separately, that means you can see exactly which nearby stores are gaining and losing, and on which channel. The licensee line matters most here because restaurant and bar volume moves in named accounts rather than as diffuse market drift, so a change there has somebody's name on it and can be acted on.

That is free, it is public, and it is the analysis this dataset is genuinely built for. It costs an afternoon and no data of yours leaves the building.

Then the numbers that would let us do the other half.Gross profit split between state commission and private categories, and your RTD and non-alcoholic sales trend. Those two decide whether the argument in Part 2 is the most important thing about your business or a footnote to it, and no public record anywhere contains them.

If a finding here is wrong, telling us so is worth as much to us as the numbers. This is built from a state file and a statute, and you are the only person who can correct what they leave out.

Part 8. Who sent this, and why it arrived unasked

We build the analysis a business would get from a good outside team, from public records, and we send it before anyone asks.

We are Scalable OS. We work with public records: state liquor sales records and published industry volume data. From those we reconstruct from them what is actually happening inside a business and the market around it. Then we send that to the business, unsolicited, before there is any relationship at all.

The reason is straightforward. The analysis in this document is the kind that normally arrives after a retainer, a discovery phase and a scoping call, which means most independent operators never see it at any point in their working lives. It is not expensive to produce, because the underlying records are public and free. It is that nobody has a reason to produce it for you until you are already a client. We would rather demonstrate the work than describe it.

There is a second reason, and it is the one that decided the shape of this document: nothing in it was requested. A search engine or an assistant answers the question you thought to ask. This report exists to raise the ones nobody inside your business has had a reason to ask, because the state can tell you exactly what every competitor sold, and nothing at all about what you earned.

Part 9. What we would send back

The state hands you a complete map of your competitors. It is worth more than the scorecard it hands you about yourself.

The map costs an afternoon; two numbers open the other half

Send us The figures below, each one an input to a number this report could not compute from the public record: gross profit by category, monthly, for 24 months; state commission received per month, held separate from private-category gross profit; linear feet of shelf and dollars of buying capital committed by category; unit and gross-profit trend for RTD and non-alcoholic categories, monthly, since those are the lines the state does not price; commission income by month, split licensee versus public, for 24 months; licensee case volume by account, monthly; share of total gross profit made up of state commission. and we will send back this same review rebuilt on your actual numbers:

  • Everything in Part 1 is reproducible from the state's own published file in a few minutes, including the fact that it lists your 2 stores as unrelated businesses.
  • With the two numbers above, the next report covers the part of your business you actually control instead of the part Oregon controls.
  • State sales data read live; category volumes as published for 2025.
Reply with an export, or with one line telling us this is wrong and where. Both are useful to us. Neither costs you anything but the time it takes.
WHAT THE FINDING IS WORTH · No public record carries a dollar figure for this. The state file records spirits the state owns and prices, on a statutory commission, so it carries no margin of yours at all. Your gross margin on wine, beer and the accessory categories is the one figure that says what the competitive read is worth.

WHAT THIS REPORT CAN AND CANNOT SEE · Built from records covering distilled spirits sales for both of your stores, by month, from the state's own file, the same for every other agent store in Oregon, which is a complete census. It cannot see wine, beer, cider, mixers, cigars, tobacco, growlers, barware and every other private category, plus all costs, staffing and margin. Oregon owns the spirits inventory and sets its price, so the covered line is the one where you have no pricing or margin decision to make. The uncovered categories are the ones you buy, price and margin yourself. No public record carries those lines at company level, which is why the only way to analyse them is with figures from inside the business.

SOURCES · Oregon Liquor and Cannabis Commission, distilled spirits store sales (gyqr-vac8): distilled spirits sales by store and month, read live, covering 83 months and every agent store in Oregon. Both of this operator's stores were identified BEFORE any figure was computed, because the file carries no ownership column and a store-level read would have described 71.2% of the business. Confidence high, and every figure is reproducible from the published file. · Oregon's control-state structure and agent compensation: Oregon Legislature alcohol regulation background brief and ORS 471.753(7), read from the statute rather than a secondary source. Confidence high. · Category volume changes for 2025 from IWSR and beverage industry reporting. Confidence medium: these are national US volumes, not Oregon and not this operator, and they are used to show direction rather than to size anything.

GAPS · No private category appears anywhere in this report: wine, beer, cider, mixers, cigars, tobacco, growlers and barware are bought, priced and margined by you and recorded nowhere public. For a store carrying hundreds of wine and beer lines that is a large share of the floor. · No cost, margin, staffing or profit figure exists in any source used here. Commission rates are public; what you keep after operating two stores is not. · Category trends cited are national US volumes and may not describe Oregon or this operator. · The state file shows spirits moving through the till, never who bought it or whether they came back, so nothing here describes your customers. · Whether the private categories out-earn the commission is the question this report is built around and cannot answer from outside.

PURPOSE · To give operators back their most scarce resource: focus.