Prepared forRadiant Plumbing & Air Conditioning
Market Position ReviewAustin and San Antonio, Texas · Home services · 27 August 2026
This report is for Texas home-service contractors running plumbing, HVAC and electrical under one roof with a membership programme already in place.
The finding

You already own the highest-value product structure in your industry, and you run it at $9.99 a month with 5% off repairs and electrical left out, while the published benchmark is $14.95 to $29.95 with 15% off and all three trades in.

Recurring revenue is the single biggest valuation lever in the trades. Buyers price it at roughly double what they pay for demand-only work, and the operators who do it well draw a quarter to half their revenue through a membership programme while the industry average sits under a fifth.

You are not missing that lever. The Care Club exists, it is priced, it is sold, and it has been running alongside a business trading since 1999. This report is about its configuration, because on the three things a member actually notices it sits below the published benchmark, and on one of them it excludes a trade you sell.

That comparison is possible from outside because both halves of it are published: your own page and the industry benchmark. Almost nothing else about your business is. What the public record CAN see is Austin installation permits, which is a minority of one of your two metros, and Part 4 says so plainly rather than dressing it up.

Your membership price
$9.99
benchmark is $14.95 to $29.95 a month
Trades your membership covers
2 of 3
electrical is sold but not included
Member repair discount
5%
benchmark is 15%
What buyers pay for recurring vs demand-only
about 2x
which is why the configuration is worth this much attention
Part 1. The asset is already built, which is the whole reason this is worth reading

Most operators do not have a membership programme at all. You have one, running alongside three trades and 3 decades of customers. The question is only how it is set up.

A membership programme is the mechanism that turns a call-when-it-breaks business into one with a base. It is also the hardest part to start, because it needs a customer list, a maintenance capability and a billing relationship. You have all three and have had them for years.

Your membership sits below the published benchmark on all three of the things a member notices
0 4 9 14 18 10 15 Monthly price (dollars) 2 3 Trades covered of three 5 15 Repair discount (percent) Your Care Club 2026 benchmark, low end
Your Care Club against the low end of the 2026 contractor-membership benchmark. Price $9.99 a month against $14.95 to $29.95; 2 trades covered against 3; 5% repair discount against 15%. Sources: Radiant Plumbing & Air Conditioning public website as read 2026-08-11; published 2026 contractor membership programme benchmarks.

Against the low end of the published 2026 benchmark, the Care Club is 33.2% cheaper, offers a third of the repair discount, and covers 2 of the 3 trades a benchmark programme bundles. Two of those three gaps are arguable and the third is not, which is what Part 2 is about.

Why this is not a pricing recommendation.A cheaper membership with high take-up can beat a dearer one with low take-up, and we cannot see your take-up. Price is the gap we are least confident about, so it is not what we recommend acting on.
Part 2. The trade you sell and do not include

Your membership covers HVAC and plumbing. You also sell electrical, and the benchmark programme bundles all three.

This is the one gap that does not depend on knowing your numbers. A member with a plumbing problem and an HVAC problem calls you, because the membership makes that automatic. A member with an electrical problem has the same relationship with you, the same billing arrangement and the same priority scheduling, and no particular reason to think of you, because the product they bought does not mention it.

The customers most likely to buy electrical work from you are the ones who have already bought twice and are paying you every month. They are also the cheapest customers you will ever reach, because reaching them costs nothing.

What the Care Club covers todayWhat a benchmark programme coversGap
HVAC: two maintenance visits a yearTwo preventive visits per trade per yearMatches on HVAC
Plumbing: one inspection a yearTwo preventive visits per trade per yearOne visit short
Electrical: not includedElectrical included in the bundleThe whole trade
5% repair discount15% repair discount15 minus 5 points
What we are not claiming.We do not know whether your electrical division has the crew capacity to absorb membership demand. That is a real reason to leave it out and it is the first thing Part 7 asks about, rather than something we assume away.
Part 3. Why the configuration of one product deserves this much attention

Because recurring revenue is not valued like other revenue, and the gap between the two is roughly double.

Buyers in this industry separate recurring revenue from demand-only work and pay materially more for the first. The reasoning is not sentimental: a maintenance base is forecastable, it survives a soft quarter, and it feeds replacement work at close rates no advertising can match. The published ranges put recurring at roughly twice the multiple of demand-only work at the same size.

Forward playWhat the record prices it atVerdict
Run a panel-upgrade programme off the electrical permit trendAustin's panel-upgrade segment is real and growing, and it is the wrong target for this business: it is installation work in one metro, measured by the one dataset that cannot see the service business you actually run. Chasing it means chasing the slice the data could see rather than the slice that pays.Rejected
Raise the membership price toward the benchmarkRejected on the objection in Part 5 rather than on evidence against it. $9.99 may be buying penetration, and penetration is the thing that matters. Without your take-up rate this is a guess with a dollar sign on it.Rejected
Compete harder on Austin plumbing installationsYou already gained 46% against a 1.4% market, so this is the line where you are already winning. Doubling down on the strongest visible line ignores that it is visible only because permits exist, not because it is the largest.Rejected
Lead with manufacturer certificationsYou name no manufacturer brands publicly and are absent from Trane's Austin dealer list. Absence from a programme you never claim is not a gap, it is a brand-agnostic position, and there is nothing here to build a claim on.Rejected
Expand into a third metroYou already run two, and for a service business profit per technician-hour is decided by drive time rather than by coverage. A third metro is the most expensive possible answer to a question your existing customer base may answer for free.Rejected
Fix technician utilisation before anything elseIf billable hours are below benchmark, every demand-side recommendation here is wrong and this becomes the report. No public record carries utilisation, so this is the second thing Part 7 asks.Untestable
Rebalance the mix between the two metrosAustin permits carry nothing about San Antonio, and no permit anywhere records service work. Whether the second metro carries its own crews or is served out of the first is the question, and only your figures answer it.Untestable
Work the existing customer base for second and third jobsAlmost certainly right and impossible to size from outside. You claim 10,000 homes served since 1999, and reaching them costs nothing. It is second rather than first because the membership fix below is a specific version of the same idea, aimed at the customers already paying you monthly.Second
Put electrical into the Care ClubThe only gap in this report that does not depend on a number we cannot see. You sell electrical. Your members do not know it is yours to sell, because the product they bought covers 2 trades. Adding it as a member discount costs no scheduled visits and no capacity promise, and it points your cheapest-to-reach customers at a division they currently have no reason to call you about.Pursue

The same logic applies whether or not you ever sell. A base that pays monthly is what makes January survivable, and it is the difference between a business that chases every quarter and one that starts each quarter already partly booked.

The number nobody outside your business can see.What share of your revenue comes through the Care Club. It is the number that decides how this report should have been written, and it is the first thing in the data ask.
Part 4. What the public record can see about you, and what it cannot

Your Austin plumbing permits rose 46% against a market that grew 1.4%. That is real, and it is a narrow slice of one of your two metros.

Your Austin plumbing permits rose 46% in a market that grew 1.4%
0.0% 13.8% 27.6% 41.5% 55.3% 46.1% Radiant's plumbing permits 1.4% The whole Austin plumbing market Growth, January to August, this year against last
319 permits last year against 466 this year, same January to early August window. This is real and it is narrow: permits record installations only, never service work, and the dataset covers Austin only. Source: City of Austin permit dataset 3syk-w9eu.

That gain is worth knowing: 319 permits last year against 466 this year while the whole Austin plumbing market moved 1.4%, so almost none of it came from a rising tide. It came from other firms.

Now the honest part

Permits record installations. Emergency repair, drain and sewer work, water heater service, diagnostics and every maintenance visit you perform generate no permit at all. For a business whose front page leads with emergency service and a maintenance club, that is most of the work. The dataset also stops at the Austin city line, and you serve San Antonio.

So what is that permit finding worth?It is a genuine signal about your installation business in one metro, and it is not a picture of your company. We are showing you both the finding and its boundary, because a report that quietly let permits stand in for the business would be describing a different company than the one you run.
Part 5. The strongest argument against everything above

Three objections. Two of them land.

First: $9.99 may be deliberate. A low price buys penetration, and penetration is what actually matters. If a large share of your customers are members, the cheap price is doing exactly its job and raising it would be the mistake. This objection lands, and it is why price is not the recommendation.

Second: the 5% discount may be sized to your margin. A benchmark discount assumes a benchmark margin, and a discount you cannot afford is worse than a small one you can. This lands too. We can see what you offer and not what it costs you.

Third: excluding electrical may be a capacity decision. Partly. If the division cannot absorb the demand, including it in the club would create promises you cannot keep. But the fix for that is a smaller inclusion rather than none: a member discount on electrical work costs no scheduled visits and creates no capacity promise. This objection explains a lighter inclusion, not a total omission, which is why the recommendation survives it.

Part 6. Nine responses, and the six the record rules out

Most of what could be recommended for a service business needs numbers that only leave the building if you send them.

Each play below was tested against the published benchmark, your own public pages and Austin's permit record. Where a play needs your figures, it says so instead of being quietly dropped, because those are the ones worth the most.

Part 7. What we would do first, and it is a page edit

Put electrical into the Care Club as a member discount, and measure whether members start calling you for it.

Not a scheduled visit and not a service promise: a member discount on electrical work, listed on the Care Club page beside the HVAC and plumbing benefits. That costs no crew time and creates no obligation you cannot meet, and it tells every member that the division exists and is theirs.

Then measure one thing for ninety days: how many electrical jobs come from Care Club members. You are the only party who can count that, and it settles whether the membership is a maintenance product or a relationship you can sell across.

The question that comes before it.Can your electrical division absorb more work? If it cannot, do this at a smaller discount rather than not at all, and the throughput question in Part 6 becomes the more urgent report.

Everything else here waits on two numbers: the share of revenue running through the Care Club, and the share of technician hours that are billable. Send those and the next report is about your business rather than about one product and one metro's installation permits.

Part 8. Who sent this, and why it arrived unasked

We build the analysis a business would get from a good outside team, from public records, and we send it before anyone asks.

We are Scalable OS. We work with public records: published membership benchmarks, city permit records and federal employment data. From those we reconstruct from them what is actually happening inside a business and the market around it. Then we send that to the business, unsolicited, before there is any relationship at all.

The reason is straightforward. The analysis in this document is the kind that normally arrives after a retainer, a discovery phase and a scoping call, which means most independent operators never see it at any point in their working lives. It is not expensive to produce, because the underlying records are public and free. It is that nobody has a reason to produce it for you until you are already a client. We would rather demonstrate the work than describe it.

There is a second reason, and it is the one that decided the shape of this document: nothing in it was requested. A search engine or an assistant answers the question you thought to ask. This report exists to raise the ones nobody inside your business has had a reason to ask, because you know what your membership includes; only the benchmark tells you what everyone else's includes.

Part 9. What we would send back

One change to a product you already sell, and two numbers that decide everything else.

The change costs a page edit; the numbers cost a spreadsheet

Send us The figures below, each one an input to a number this report could not compute from the public record: membership count, monthly fee and renewal rate, by month for 24 months; service calls completed versus memberships sold, monthly; revenue split between recurring agreements and demand-only work; how many customers book maintenance more than once a year, which separates a real recurring habit from a renamed one-off; paid hours versus billable hours per technician, weekly, for a year; booked calls missed, cancelled or rescheduled per week; revenue per technician per month, for 24 months. and we will send back this same review rebuilt on your actual numbers:

  • Everything in Part 1 is checkable in two minutes: your own Care Club page against any published 2026 contractor-membership benchmark.
  • With those two numbers, this becomes a report about your whole business rather than about one product and one metro's installation permits.
  • If a finding here is wrong, telling us so is worth as much to us as the numbers.
  • Membership terms as published 2026-08-11; permit data read live.
Reply with an export, or with one line telling us this is wrong and where. Both are useful to us. Neither costs you anything but the time it takes.
WHAT THE FINDING IS WORTH · No public record carries a dollar figure for this. Neither your membership page nor the Austin permit file carries a dollar. Your Care Club member count and your annual electrical revenue are the two figures that price the excluded trade.

WHAT THIS REPORT CAN AND CANNOT SEE · Built from records covering your membership programme's structure, price and inclusions, from your own public pages, Austin plumbing and electrical permit activity, which is installation work only. It cannot see San Antonio entirely, all service and repair revenue, membership penetration, technician utilisation, and every dollar figure in the business. Permits record installations, never service, and the dataset stops at the Austin city line. For a two-metro repair-and-maintenance business that is a minority of one half. The membership comparison does not have that problem: both sides of it are published. No public record carries those lines at company level, which is why the only way to analyse them is with figures from inside the business.

SOURCES · Radiant Plumbing & Air Conditioning public website, read 2026-08-11 · price, inclusions, trades covered and discount are quoted from your own published page. Confidence high on what is published, and a programme's terms can change without notice, which is why the capture is dated and expires. · published 2026 contractor membership programme benchmarks: published 2026 contractor-membership benchmarks. Confidence medium, and deliberately not load-bearing on magnitude. The comparison in Part 1 is STRUCTURAL, meaning trades covered, visits and discount, all of which are observed on both sides. · City of Austin permit dataset 3syk-w9eu: Austin plumbing and electrical permits, read live, January to early August window on both sides so the comparison is seasonally matched. Confidence high on counts, and permits are installation records only.

GAPS · San Antonio does not appear in any dataset used here. Austin's permit file stops at the city line, so half your service area is invisible. · Permits record installations only. Emergency repair, drains and sewers, water heater service, diagnostics and every maintenance visit generate no permit, and for a business leading with emergency service and a maintenance club that is likely most of the work. · Membership penetration, technician utilisation, average ticket, callback rate and every dollar figure are absent from every public record. · We can see what your membership offers and not what it costs you to deliver, which is why the discount and the price are described rather than prescribed. · Whether the electrical exclusion is a capacity decision is the single thing that would most change this report, and it is the first question in Part 7.

PURPOSE · To give operators back their most scarce resource: focus.